Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41751497›Full record

ReviewCurrent issues in molecular biology2026

Contact Unmodified Antisense DNA Biotechnology (CUADb)-Based Oligonucleotide Insecticides and RNA Biocontrols: Molecular Bases and Potential in Plant Protection.

Vol Oberemok, Kate Laikova, Jamin Ali, Ilyas Chachoua, Nikita Gal'chinsky

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current issues in molecular biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Extracellular ssDNA fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Vol OberemokDepartment of General Biology and Genetics, Institute of Biochemical Technologies, Ecology and Pharmacy, V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University, Simferopol 295007, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-7472-2389
Kate LaikovaDepartment of General Biology and Genetics, Institute of Biochemical Technologies, Ecology and Pharmacy, V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University, Simferopol 295007, Russia.
Jamin AliCollege of Plant Protection, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7698-5000
Ilyas ChachouaDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Bilkent University, Ankara 06800, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-5112-5394
Nikita Gal'chinskyDepartment of General Biology and Genetics, Institute of Biochemical Technologies, Ecology and Pharmacy, V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University, Simferopol 295007, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-0513-7140

Funding

Russian Science Foundation 25-16-20070The framework of a state assignment V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University for 2024 and the planning period of 2024-2026 FZEG-2024-0001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in molecular genetics, nucleic acid synthesis, and bioinformatics have provided novel opportunities for plants' protection against insect pests. Currently, both DNA and RNA serve as active insecticidal ingredients, transcending their traditional role as carriers of genetic information. This novel activity is achieved through two fundamentally distinct mechanisms. The first one is DNA containment (DNAc), employing oligonucleotide insecticides based on contact unmodified antisense DNA biotechnology (CUADb), also known as 'genetic zipper' technology. The second one is RNA interference (RNAi), employing RNA biocontrols based on double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) technology. The investigation of the molecular mechanism underlying the antisense activity of nucleic acids emerged in the early 1960s. While the antisense effects of RNA in gene silencing through interference (RNAi) was documented in the late 1990s as antiviral immune responses in nematodes, the CUADb antisense approach initially emerged as a powerful strategy for pest control against lepidopterans in 2008. The CUADb approach relies on disrupting rRNA biogenesis and ribosome production, while RNAi shows the best results in mRNA degradation and no efficient result is known for rRNA. The efficacy of these approaches appears to be species dependent. For example, CUADb demonstrates optimal activity against Sternorrhyncha (e.g., aphids, mealybugs, psyllids, and scale insects), thrips, and mites. In turn, the RNAi strategy shows a strong insecticidal potential against beetles from the Tenebrionidae and Chrysomelidae families. Here, we will review the differences between the two technologies, their mechanisms of action and the current challenges facing their adoption.

Indexed as

CUAD biotechnologyDNA containmentdouble-stranded RNA technology‘genetic zipper’ technologynext-generation insecticidesoligonucleotide insecticidesplant protectionRNA biocontrolsRNA interference

Identifiers

PMID41751497
PMCPMC12939486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.