ReviewBiomedicines2026
Modes of (Inter)Actions of Polyvalent Immunoglobulins: Nonclinical and Clinical Research in Severe Bacterial Infections.
Review in Biomedicines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In severe bacterial infections, endotoxin- and exotoxin-induced inflammation and tissue damage, combined with the consequent excessive production of inflammatory mediators by neutrophils, may result in sepsis, septic shock, organ failure, and possibly death. Evidence suggests that supplementation with polyvalent intravenous (IV) immunoglobulin (Ig) preparations, such as standard IVIg or IgM/IgA-enriched Ig preparations, could be an additional treatment option. However, their use in severe bacterial infections like sepsis and septic shock is still a matter of debate. This review summarizes the diverse beneficial mechanisms of (inter)actions of Igs with pathogens and the host. Support for these mechanisms comes from numerous nonclinical studies, complemented by clinical research in adult patients with sepsis, septic shock, and other severe infectious diseases. Depending on Ig type, timepoint of administration, patient population, and dose, the pathogen- and host-induced inflammatory responses are modulated by the combined (inter)actions of polyvalent IgM, IgA, and IgG, with pathogens, and particularly with the host's neutrophil and complement pathways. However, while nonclinical and clinical studies suggest potential benefits of Ig therapy, clinical evidence remains heterogeneous, and trials with low risk of bias have not consistently demonstrated a definitive survival benefit. A deeper understanding of the conditions under which Ig treatment benefits patients with severe bacterial infections will help select patients most likely to profit from Ig treatment and achieve better outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.