ReviewBiomedicines2026
Challenges and Opportunities in Lentivirus Viral Vector Manufacturing for In Vivo Applications.
Review in Biomedicines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Overview of Delivery Methods for Gene Editing.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027Review
- Injectable bioinstructive microfoam for rapid bedside/in vivo programming of CAR-T cells.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2026Article
- In Vivo CAR-Based Immune Cell Engineering: Future Applications and Challenges in Malignant Glioma.Cancers · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The clinical success of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies has revolutionized oncology, yet the high costs and logistical complexities of ex vivo manufacturing remain significant barriers to global patient access. In vivo cell therapy, which involves the direct injection of lentiviral vectors (LVVs) to engineer cells within the patient's body, offers a promising, cost-effective alternative. However, transitioning from ex vivo to in vivo applications necessitates a fundamental shift in LVV biomanufacturing to ensure safety and efficacy. This paper examines the critical bottlenecks in the current LVV production landscape. In upstream processing, we explore LVV particle assembly and maturation mechanisms, the effect of transgene size on LVV functional titers and the formation of non-functional byproducts, including empty and partially formed LVV particles and extracellular vesicles (EVs). These impurities pose severe risks of immunotoxicity and insertional mutagenesis when delivered in vivo. In downstream processing, we highlight the challenges of purifying labile LVV particles, emphasizing the need for rapid, high-resolution separation techniques like continuous processing to maintain functional titers. Furthermore, we address the limitations of current analytical assays, which often fail to distinguish mature, functional LVVs from structurally similar but inactive contaminants. We conclude that the future of in vivo lentiviral therapy depends on developing novel purification strategies based on subtle biophysical differences-such as surface charge and capsid morphology-and implementing robust, high-throughput analytics to ensure delivery of high-purity, potent therapeutic viral vectors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.