ReviewBiomedicines2026
Immunosuppressive Environment of Pancreatic NENs-A Review.
Review in Biomedicines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs) are rare tumors with significant biological diversity. Despite significant improvements in diagnostics and a growing range of available therapies, long-term disease control remains difficult in advanced cases. The tumor microenvironment, which in pNENs adopts a predominantly immunosuppressive profile and promotes tumor development, is attracting increasing attention. A complex network of interactions dominates the tumor tissue, including M2 macrophages, regulatory T cells, and numerous pathways that inhibit effector lymphocyte activity. M2 macrophages, through the secretion of anti-inflammatory cytokines and exosome-mediated signaling, support angiogenesis while simultaneously attenuating the cytotoxic response. Simultaneously, receptors and ligands associated with immune checkpoints are overexpressed. In addition to classic molecules such as PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4, the role of B7x and CD276 is increasingly being emphasized, as their presence correlates with rapid disease progression and poor prognosis. To date, attempts to use checkpoint inhibitors as monotherapy have yielded modest clinical benefits. However, approaches based on combination strategies-both in the form of dual immune blockade and in combination with chemotherapy or angiogenesis-targeted therapy-have shown significantly greater activity. Therapies using tyrosine kinase inhibitors, such as sunitinib and newer drugs (lenvatinib, surufatinib, cabozantinib), may partially normalize the tumor's disrupted vascular architecture and thus increase its susceptibility to immunological interventions. In the coming years, it will be crucial not only to overcome the immunosuppressive nature of the TME but also to identify predictive biomarkers that will allow for more precise patient selection. This approach may open the way to more effective, personalized therapies for pNENs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.