Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41751233›Full record

ReviewBiomedicines2026

From the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial to Antibody-Mediated Optic Neuritis: Four Decades of Progress and Unanswered Questions.

Marco A Lana-Peixoto, Natália C Talim, Paulo P Christo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedicines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marco A Lana-PeixotoCIEM MS Research Center, Minas Gerais Medical School, Federal University, Belo Horizonte 30130-090, MG, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2454-681X
Natália C TalimCIEM MS Research Center, Minas Gerais Medical School, Federal University, Belo Horizonte 30130-090, MG, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2664-6534
Paulo P ChristoCIEM MS Research Center, Minas Gerais Medical School, Federal University, Belo Horizonte 30130-090, MG, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1224-5243

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optic neuritis (ON) has been recognized since antiquity, but its modern clinical identity emerged only in the late 19th century and was definitively shaped by the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial (ONTT). The ONTT established the natural history, visual prognosis, association with multiple sclerosis (MS), and therapeutic response to corticosteroids, building the foundation for contemporary ON management. Subsequent discoveries-most notably aquaporin-4 IgG-associated ON (AQP4-ON), myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated ON (MOG-ON), and double-negative ON-have fundamentally transformed this paradigm, shifting ON from a seemingly uniform demyelinating syndrome to a group of biologically distinct disorders. These subtypes differ in immunopathology, clinical course, MRI features, retinal injury patterns, CSF profiles, and long-term outcomes, making early and accurate differentiation essential. MRI provides key distinctions in lesion length, orbital tissue inflammation, bilateral involvement, and chiasmal or optic tract extension. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) offers complementary structural biomarkers, including severe early ganglion cell loss in AQP4-ON, relative preservation in MOG-ON, and variable patterns in double-negative ON. CSF analysis further refines diagnosis, with oligoclonal bands strongly supporting MS-ON. Together, these modalities enable precise early stratification and timely initiation of targeted immunotherapy, which is critical for preventing irreversible visual disability. Despite major advances, significant unmet needs persist. Access to high-resolution MRI, OCT, cell-based antibody assays, and evidence-based treatments remains limited in many regions, contributing to global disparities in outcomes. The understanding of the pathogenesis of double-negative optic neuritis, the identification of reliable biomarkers of relapse and visual recovery, and the determination of standardized cut-off values for multimodal diagnostic tools-including MRI, OCT, CSF analysis, and serological assays-remain unresolved challenges. Future research must expand biomarker discovery, refine imaging criteria, and ensure equitable global access to cutting-edge diagnostic platforms and therapeutic innovations. Four decades after the ONTT, ON remains a dynamic field of investigation, with ongoing advances holding the potential to transform care for patients worldwide. Together, these advances expose a fundamental tension between historically MS-centered diagnostic frameworks and the emerging biological heterogeneity of ON, a tension that underpins the structure and critical perspective of the present review.

Indexed as

AQP4-associated optic neuritisCSF biomarkersdouble-negative optic neuritisMOG-associated optic neuritisMRI biomarkersMS-associated optic neuritisoptical coherence tomographyoptic neuritisOptic Neuritis Treatment Trial

Identifiers

PMID41751233
PMCPMC12938181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.