ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026
Trained Scent Dog Detection and GC-MS Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds from Murine Coronavirus-Infected Cell Cultures.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are increasingly recognized as metabolic byproducts of viral infection and may serve as olfactory cues detectable by trained scent dogs. This study examined whether dogs could distinguish cell culture samples infected with murine hepatitis virus strain 1 (MHV-1), a biosafety level 2 coronavirus model, from uninfected controls. Parallel chemical analysis using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) identified 14 VOCs in infected and 12 in control samples. Notably, 3-heptanone and 1-nonanol were unique to infected samples, while others such as acetophenone, nonanal, decanal, and benzaldehyde were significantly elevated-often by 1.5 to 3 times-in infected cultures. Two trained dogs demonstrated high detection sensitivity (0.95) for infected samples compared to a previously trained odor cinnamon group (0.88) and responded with shorter latency (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.