Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41751105›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026

Bio-Economic Comparison of Pure Holstein, Simmental × Holstein, and Montbéliarde × Holstein Crossbred Dairy Cows.

Soheila Noormohammadi, Seyed Abbas Rafat, Sadegh Alijani, Karim Hasanpur, Hadi Esfandyari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Soheila NoormohammadiDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz, Tabriz 51666, Iran.
Seyed Abbas RafatDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz, Tabriz 51666, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-0231-1331
Sadegh AlijaniDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz, Tabriz 51666, Iran.
Karim HasanpurDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz, Tabriz 51666, Iran.
Hadi EsfandyariIndependent Researcher, Chamerstrasse 56, 6300 Zug, Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The economic performance of Holstein, Montbéliarde × Holstein, and Simmental × Holstein cows was evaluated using a bio-economic model. The results showed differences in income and costs between crossbred and pure Holstein groups. The Montbéliarde-Holstein crossbreds had the highest milk income ($2223) and profitability ($1002) compared to the Simmental crossbreds and pure Holstein. In contrast, pure Holstein made the most money from selling extra heifers, while both crossbred groups, especially Simmental × Holstein, made more money from selling male calves. Crossbred systems had much lower annual maintenance costs. Simmental × Holstein had variable costs that were 22% lower than those of pure Holstein. Trait-based economic evaluations demonstrated that Montbéliarde crossbreds exhibited the highest economic value for milk production, while Simmental crosses were more susceptible to prolonged calving intervals. Both crossbred groups had higher birth weights and growth rates than Holstein cows. Overall, these results provide strong evidence that crossbreeding Holstein with Montbéliarde maximizes overall profitability, while Simmental × Holstein also offers notable economic benefits through reduced maintenance costs and improved growth performance.

Indexed as

crossbreedingeconomic comparisonmilk productionprofitability

Identifiers

PMID41751105
PMCPMC12937380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.