ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026
Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Modeling Postprandial Plasma Amino Acids Kinetics in Pigs.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Postprandial plasma amino acid (AA) kinetics serve as essential indicators of digestive efficiency and systemic metabolic status in pigs. Traditional kinetic analysis relies on Non-Linear Least Squares (NLS) regression using compartmental models, yet these methods typically demand repeated blood sampling and precise initialization to ensure convergence. In this study, we developed a Physics-Informed Neural Network (PINN) framework by integrating mechanistic Ordinary Differential Equations (ODEs) directly into the deep learning loss function. The framework was evaluated using a benchmark dataset. Specifically, we performed a retrospective analysis by downsampling the original high-frequency data to simulate dense and sparse sampling strategies. The results demonstrate that while both models exhibit high fidelity under dense sampling, PINN maintains superior robustness and predictive accuracy under data-constrained conditions. Under the sparse sampling scenario, PINN reduced the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) compared to NLS in key metabolic profiles, such as Methionine in the FAA group (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.