Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41751085›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026

Determining Minimum Trial Numbers for Reliable Lameness Detection in Canine Kinematic Studies.

Isabel Marrero, Angelo Santana, José Manuel Vilar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Isabel MarreroHospital Clinico Veterinario, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Trasmontaña S/N, 35416 Arucas, Las Palmas, Spain.
Angelo SantanaDepartamento de Matemáticas, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, 35018 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6513-4814
José Manuel VilarInstituto Universitario de Investigaciones Biomédicas y Sanitarias, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Trasmontaña S/N, 35416 Arucas, Las Palmas, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2060-2274

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual orthopedic gait assessment in dogs is recognized as subjective and is limited by interobserver variability. Objective detection of lameness is offered by biomechanical analysis, where asymmetry between limbs is quantified through kinematic parameters and symmetry indices. However, the minimum number of trials (full stride cycles) required to reliably discriminate lameness has remained a challenge. In this study, six healthy adult dogs were used. Mild, reversible lameness was induced in one forelimb using a cotton pad. Dogs were walked along a straight runway, and kinematic data were captured with a high-speed video camera. Stride length (SLE), support time (ST), and elbow range of motion (ROM) were measured. Symmetry indices (for linear and temporal parameters) and the symmetry angle (for angular parameters) were computed. The asymptotic distribution of these indices was derived using the delta method, which allowed for the construction of confidence intervals (CIs) and hypothesis tests for an asymmetry threshold of 3%. The number of trials required to achieve reliable detection was estimated through statistical simulations. Results indicated that the required number of trials was highly dependent on both the kinematic parameter and the magnitude of asymmetry. While detecting subtle asymmetries (≈4%) required a high number of trials (up to 347 for stride length), the requirements decreased substantially for more pronounced lameness. For a true asymmetry of 6%, 11-39 trials per limb were sufficient to achieve 80-90% power. It is concluded that the collection of only five trials is insufficient for detecting mild asymmetries. A statistical framework and practical recommendations for kinematic gait studies in dogs are provided.

Indexed as

delta methodgait analysislamenesssymmetry indicestrial number

Identifiers

PMID41751085
PMCPMC12937312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.