ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026
Developing a Practical Welfare Assessment Tool for Intensive Sheep and Goat Farming in Hot-Arid Regions: Pilot Validation in the United Arab Emirates.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Intensive sheep and goat farming in hot-arid regions faces unique welfare challenges that differ substantially from those encountered in cooler climates; however, few practical and validated assessment tools are specifically designed to assess welfare under such extreme conditions. In this study, the term practical refers to field feasibility under routine farm conditions, limited assessment time, and suitability for reliability-based application, rather than comprehensive validation of welfare outcomes. This study aimed to develop and pilot-test a simplified welfare assessment protocol, based on a reduced set of clearly defined, field-applicable indicators supported by explicit operational definitions and standardized scoring criteria, tailored for the United Arab Emirates, with a specific focus on extreme heat and intensive husbandry conditions. Candidate indicators were identified from validated international sources and screened for applicability to arid climates, meat-oriented production, and intensive systems. The refined indicator set was converted into operational scoring sheets and applied by trained undergraduate animal science students as assessors to 100 animals at an intensive research farm. Inter-observer reliability was calculated using Fleiss' Kappa to evaluate consistency across assessors. Most behavioural and health indicators demonstrated substantial to almost perfect inter-observer agreement (κ-based), while environmental and some tactile indicators, such as body condition and hydration tests, showed moderate reliability. Based on the most reliable indicators, a climate-sensitive Arid-Hot Small Ruminant Welfare Index (ASR-WI) was developed by weighting four welfare domains-Behaviour and Mental State, Environment, Nutrition, and Health. The findings confirm that a simplified welfare assessment protocol can be reliably implemented under intensive hot-arid conditions when clear scoring criteria and structured assessor training are provided. The resulting protocol and index offer a practical foundation for routine welfare monitoring under intensive hot-arid conditions, as well as for policymaking and future longitudinal research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.