ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026
Swine Influenza Virus Introduction in Pig Farms: A Semi-Quantitative Risk Assessment in Northern Italy.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Swine influenza is a viral zoonotic respiratory disease of pigs threatening both animal and human health due to its pandemic potential. We conducted a semi-quantitative risk assessment to classify 22 commercial pig farms in northern Italy in terms of the likelihood of introduction of influenza, evaluating their biosecurity systems and geographical locations. We used a modified Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) to calculate Risk Priority Codes (RPCs), indicating increasing risk levels (from 1 to 5) for six biosecurity criteria: (A) personnel, (B) animal management, (C) shelter management, (D) animal transport, (E) materials management, and (F) buildings and access control. Then, an overall risk index, including the geographical risk, was calculated to obtain the final risk ranking of the farms. All farms obtained the highest risk level (RPC = 5) for criterion F (buildings and access control), mostly due to poor control of visitor access. Fifteen farms scored a medium risk level (RPCs = 3) for criterion related to personnel due to some weaknesses in the use of personal protective equipment, although 90% of personnel had recent biosecurity training. In an endemic context, risk assessment helps identify high-risk farms, supporting surveillance for early detection of new influenza strains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.