Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41750982›Full record

ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Application of Freeze-Drying Technology in the Food Industry: A Review.

Angelique Uwineza, Xiaojun Zhang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Angelique UwinezaCollege of Fisheries, Zhejiang Ocean University, Zhoushan 316022, China.
Xiaojun ZhangZhejiang Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Zhoushan 316021, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8807-5450

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Freeze-drying, also known as lyophilization, is a state-of-the-art method for preserving food, offering excellent retention properties for nutrients, structure, and taste compared to other drying processes. Freeze-drying yields a product visually similar to fresh produce. However, due to the high energy requirements and operational costs associated with the process, its broader use as an industrial tool is limited. This review encompasses the optimization of all key stages, including pretreatment, freezing, primary drying, secondary drying, and storage. Process efficiency and product quality depend on a variety of factors, including raw material composition, pretreatment strategies (e.g., Pulsed Electric Fields), chamber pressure, shelf temperature, and freezing rate. These parameters are critical control points for determining the final product outcome. Optimizing these parameters is essential; as summarized by recent research, lyophilization effectively protects bioactive compounds, color, flavor, and rehydration ability in various food systems, including fruits, vegetables, meats, seafood, and specialty products. To achieve broader industrial adoption, this gold-standard method requires advancements in process intensification and hybrid drying systems, potentially integrated with intelligent process control. These advances are crucial to enhancing the economic viability of freeze-dried products and maintaining their reputation as the gold standard in creating high-quality, shelf-stable food products. This review consolidates current knowledge into a coherent conceptual model. The model clarifies the deterministic sequence by which adjustable processing conditions direct essential physicochemical changes within the food matrix, thereby defining the product ultimate nutritional, sensory, and stability properties. Establishing this cause-and-effect framework provides a foundation for systematic process improvement and facilitates broader commercial implementation.

Indexed as

bioactive compoundsfood preservationlyophilizationprocess optimizationquality parametersrehydration capacitysublimation dehydration

Identifiers

PMID41750982
PMCPMC12940823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.