ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A Rapid Grading Method for Beef Appearance Quality Based on Smartphone Imaging and ImageJ.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The grading of beef appearance quality is crucial for standardizing market circulation and promoting the upgrading of the beef cattle industry. China's current beef quality grading system, which relies primarily on human sensory-based visual assessment with marbling and meat color as core parameters, suffers from strong subjectivity, low efficiency, and large errors. This study proposes a rapid grading method for beef rib eye muscle using smartphone imaging combined with ImageJ software. Standardized images were acquired, and ImageJ was employed for grayscale conversion, threshold segmentation, and morphological processing to extract length, width, area, and marbling proportion. The R, G, B color channels were separated to calculate the R/(R + G + B) color ratio. Pearson correlation analysis showed that the ImageJ results were highly consistent with manual measurements (correlation coefficients > 0.97), indicating good reliability. A five-level grading standard (A1-A5) was established, characterized by low cost, simple operation, and objective results. It provides an economical technical solution for beef quality grading and facilitates the intelligent development of the industry. It should be noted that this experimental grading model has only been validated under the specific experimental conditions of this study, and further verification is required for broader application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.