Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41750885›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Assessing the Impact of Climate-Smart Agricultural Practices on Household Welfare and Poverty Among Smallholder Maize Farmers in KwaZulu-Natal Province, South Africa.

Minentle L Mnukwa, Lelethu Mdoda, Yanga Nontu, Samuel S Ntlanga, Phiwe Jiba, Lwando Mbambalala, Lungile S Gidi, Mosima M Mabitsela

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Minentle L MnukwaDiscipline of Agricultural Economics, School of Agriculture and Science, University of KwaZulu-Natal, P/Bag X01, Scottsville, Pietermaritzburg 3209, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-9828-1426
Lelethu MdodaDiscipline of Agricultural Economics, School of Agriculture and Science, University of KwaZulu-Natal, P/Bag X01, Scottsville, Pietermaritzburg 3209, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-5402-1304
Yanga NontuDepartment of Agriculture, University of Zululand, P/Bag X1001, KwaDlangezwa 3886, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-4843-9437
Samuel S NtlangaDiscipline of Agricultural Economics, School of Agriculture and Science, University of KwaZulu-Natal, P/Bag X01, Scottsville, Pietermaritzburg 3209, South Africa.
Phiwe JibaDepartment of Agriculture, University of Zululand, P/Bag X1001, KwaDlangezwa 3886, South Africa.
Lwando MbambalalaSchool of Interdisciplinary Research and Graduate Studies, College of Graduate Studies, University of South Africa (UNISA), Preller Street, Muckleneuk Ridge, Pretoria 0003, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-2572-274X
Lungile S GidiDepartment of Agricultural Economics and Animal Production, University of Limpopo, Private Bag X1106, Sovenga 0727, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-2896-2709
Mosima M MabitselaDepartment of Agriculture, University of Zululand, P/Bag X1001, KwaDlangezwa 3886, South Africa.

Funding

National Research Foundation MND210710621628
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Climate-smart agricultural practices (CSAPs) are promoted as pathways for improving productivity and resilience among smallholder farmers; however, empirical evidence on their welfare effects remains limited in South Africa. This study examines the impact of CSAP adoption on household welfare among smallholder maize farmers in KwaZulu-Natal Province. A cross-sectional survey of 300 households was conducted using a multistage sampling approach. Welfare outcomes was measured using multidimensional indicators including the Household Dietary Diversity Score (HDDS), the Household Food Insecurity Access Scale (HFIAS), the Coping Strategy Index (CSI), and the Foster-Greer-Thorbecke (FGT) poverty index. An Endogenous Switching Regression (ESR) model was employed to correct for selection bias and to generate counterfactuals that estimate what adopters' welfare would have been in the absence of CSAP uptake. Results show that access to extension, group membership, and training significantly increased the likelihood of CSAP adoption. ESR outcomes indicate that adopters had higher dietary diversity, lower food insecurity, and reduced reliance on severe coping strategies. Counterfactual analysis reveals that adopters would have experienced significantly poorer welfare outcomes had they not adopted CSAPs. The findings demonstrate that CSAP adoption yields measurable welfare benefits and improves household resilience. The study recommends targeted investments in extension support, farmer organizations, and institutional arrangements to accelerate the adoption of CSAP and enhance household welfare.

Indexed as

agricultural resilienceclimate-smart agricultural practicesendogenous switching regressionfood insecurityhousehold welfaremaize farmerspovertysmallholdersSouth Africa

Identifiers

PMID41750885
PMCPMC12940911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.