Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41750837›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Comparing the Environmental Impacts of Representative Food Donation and Redistribution Strategies.

Zhijian Guo, Tianhong Mu, Beth Feingold, Akiko Hosler, Christine Bozlak, Stacy Pettigrew, Xiaobo Romeiko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Zhijian GuoDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University at Albany, State University of New York, 1400 Washington Avenue, Albany, NY 12222, USA.ORCID 0009-0001-4722-6117
Tianhong MuDepartment of Environmental and Sustainable Engineering, University at Albany, State University of New York, 1400 Washington Avenue, Albany, NY 12222, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2868-2643
Beth FeingoldDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, University at Albany, State University of New York, 1 University Place, Rensselaer, NY 12144, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6670-5845
Akiko HoslerDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University at Albany, State University of New York, 1 University Place, Rensselaer, NY 12144, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0642-1060
Christine BozlakDepartment of Health Policy, Management, and Behavior, University at Albany, State University of New York, 1 University Place, Rensselaer, NY 12144, USA.
Stacy PettigrewRadix Ecological Sustainability Center, 153 Grand Street, Albany, NY 12202, USA.
Xiaobo RomeikoDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, University at Albany, State University of New York, 1 University Place, Rensselaer, NY 12144, USA.

Funding

Foundation for Food and Agriculture Research 557409National Science Foundation 2115405
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assessing the environmental impacts of food donation systems is necessary to support food donation policy and management. Few life cycle assessment (LCA) studies have investigated the environmental impacts of food donation systems. This comparative LCA study analyzed the environmental impacts of eight different donation scenarios reflecting diverse supply chain configurations and operational management options, using 391.8 kg of redistributed food over two weeks as the functional unit. Each of the eight scenarios presented net environmental benefits for all five life cycle environmental impact categories: 132~233 kg CO

Indexed as

environmental impactsfood donationgreenhouse gas emissionslife cycle assessmentsupply chainwaste management

Identifiers

PMID41750837
PMCPMC12939375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.