Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41750809›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Omnivores, Flexitarians, Vegetarians, and Vegans Attach Different Importance to Eleven Motives for Daily Food Choice Decisions: Findings from 5111 UK Adults.

Sara R Jaeger, Glenn B H Andersen, John Prescott

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sara R JaegerDepartment of Food Science, Aarhus University, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-4960-5233
Glenn B H AndersenDepartment of Food Science, Aarhus University, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-7698-1146
John PrescottTasteMatters, Sydney, NSW 1230, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5811-9114

Funding

Riddet Institute A1615154The Faculty of Technical Sciences at Aarhus University Not available
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many initiatives aimed at improving population-wide health or providing food sources that are sustainable and environmentally friendly are focused on a switch from primarily meat-based diets to diets that are more vegetable-based. Building rational approaches to promoting such changes requires an understanding of consumers' motives for their dietary choices. Aiming to extend prior research, the present study examines eleven food choice motives across nine dietary groups varying in their adoption of diets that are plant-based, from omnivores through meat-reducing flexitarian groups to vegetarian sub-groups and vegans. Using a large population sample and Best-Worst scaling, a novel approach to assessing the relative importance of these motives, we show that the dietary groups are distinguished from one another by a relatively small number of food choice motives. The most substantive of these are Sensory Appeal and Animal Welfare concerns, the former being most characteristic of those consuming meat as part of their diet, and the latter being rated more important by the different vegetarian and vegan groups. Various forms of flexitarian diets are driven by differences in the relative importance of several food choice motives. Generally notable is the finding that, in contrast to previous studies, the importance attached to Health, Weight Control, and Natural Content is not particularly characteristic of any specific dietary approach. The research contributes new fine-grained knowledge about motives for different dietary choices, which can be harnessed for intervention and policy actions.

Indexed as

best-worst scalingconsumer researchdietary preferencesfood choice motivesonline survey

Identifiers

PMID41750809
PMCPMC12939115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.