Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41750401›Full record

ReviewBiomolecules2026

Graph Learning in Bioinformatics: A Survey of Graph Neural Network Architectures, Biological Graph Construction and Bioinformatics Applications.

Lijia Deng, Ziyang Dong, Zhengling Yang, Bo Gong, Le Zhang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomolecules, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Artificial intelligence-driven advancements in agricultural biotechnology.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lijia DengClinical Medical Research Center, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences and Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 610054, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0158-7694
Ziyang DongSchool of Computer Science, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China.
Zhengling YangGenetic Diseases Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province and the Center for Medical Genetics, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences and Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 610054, China.
Bo GongDepartment of Human Disease Genes Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province and Institute of Laboratory Medicine, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences and Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 610054, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1847-7432
Le ZhangSchool of Computer Science, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3708-1727

Funding

Noncommunicable ChronicDiseases-National Science and Technology Major Project 2025ZD0551300
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have become a central methodology for modelling biological systems where entities and their interactions form inherently non-Euclidean structures. From protein interaction networks and gene regulatory circuits to molecular graphs and multi-omics integration, the relational nature of biological data makes GNNs particularly well-suited for capturing complex dependencies that traditional deep learning methods fail to represent. Despite their rapid adoption, the effectiveness of GNNs in bioinformatics depends not only on model design but also on how biological graphs are constructed, parameterised and trained. In this review, we provide a structured framework for understanding and applying GNNs in bioinformatics, organised around three key dimensions: (1) graph construction and representation, including strategies for deriving biological networks from heterogeneous sources and selecting biologically meaningful node and edge features; (2) GNN architectures, covering spectral and spatial formulations, representative models such as Graph Convolutional Networks (GCNs), Graph Attention Networks (GATs), Graph Sample and AggregatE (GraphSAGE) and Graph Isomorphism Network (GIN), and recent advances including transformer-based and self-supervised paradigms; and (3) applications in biomedical domains, spanning disease-gene association prediction, drug discovery, protein structure and function analysis, multi-omics integration and biomedical knowledge graphs. We further examine training considerations, including optimisation techniques, regularisation strategies and challenges posed by data sparsity and noise in biological settings. By synthesising methodological foundations with domain-specific applications, this review clarifies how graph quality, architectural choice and training dynamics jointly influence model performance. We also highlight emerging challenges such as modelling temporal biological processes, improving interpretability, and enabling robust multimodal fusion that will shape the next generation of GNNs in computational biology.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyGraph Neural NetworksGene Regulatory NetworksHumansbioinformaticsbiological graph constructiongraph convolutional networksgraph neural network

Identifiers

PMID41750401
PMCPMC12938586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.