ArticleBrain sciences2026
EEG Feature Extraction and Classification for Upper Limb Flexion and Extension Motor Imagery Based on Discriminative Filter Bank Common Spatial Pattern.
Article in Brain sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTraditional common spatial pattern (CSP) algorithms for upper limb neural rehabilitation face inherent challenges of overlapping cortical representations and frequency sensitivity, which hinder the decoding performance of motor imagery (MI) electroencephalogram (EEG) signals.
objectiveTo address these issues, this study adopts an improved discriminative filter bank CSP (DFBCSP) framework and applies it to the decoding of upper limb MI-EEG signals, achieving remarkable classification performance.
methodsEEG data were acquired from sixteen participants performing two-class (left upper limb flexion-extension vs. relaxing) and three-class (left upper limb flexion vs. right upper limb extension vs. relaxing) MI tasks. The acquired EEG data were then decomposed into nine distinct sub-bands, followed by the adoption of a mutual information-based feature selection strategy to optimize the feature sets. These optimized feature sets were subsequently input into three classification models, namely multilayer perceptron (MLP), support vector machine (SVM), and linear discriminant analysis (LDA), for MI task classification.
resultsExperimental results demonstrate that the DFBCSP + MLP method significantly outperforms the traditional CSP approach. Specifically, it achieves an accuracy of 94.83% (Kappa coefficient: 0.890) in two-class MI tasks and 86.20% (Kappa coefficient: 0.775) in three-class MI tasks.
conclusionThe DFBCSP + MLP framework exhibits high robustness and provides a potential technical framework and theoretical basis for future research on the rehabilitation of patients with upper limb motor dysfunction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.