ReviewBrain sciences2026
Computational Modeling of Parkinson's Disease Across Scales: From Mechanisms to Biomarkers, Drug Discovery, and Personalized Therapies.
Review in Brain sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Parkinson's disease (PD) is a multifactorial neurodegenerative disorder characterized by complex interactions across molecular, cellular, circuit, and behavioral scales. While experimental and clinical studies have provided critical insights into PD pathology, integrating these heterogeneous data into coherent mechanistic frameworks and translational strategies remains a major challenge. Computational modeling offers a powerful approach to bridge these scales, enabling the systematic investigation of disease mechanisms, candidate biomarkers, and therapeutic strategies. In this review, we survey state-of-the-art computational approaches applied to PD, spanning molecular dynamics and biophysical models, cellular- and circuit-level network models, systems and abstract-level simulations of basal ganglia function, and whole-brain and data-driven models linked to clinical phenotypes. We highlight how multiscale and hybrid modeling strategies connect α-synuclein pathology, mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative stress, and dopaminergic degeneration to alterations in neural dynamics and motor and non-motor symptoms. We further discuss the role of computational models in biomarker discovery, including imaging, electrophysiological, and digital biomarkers. In particular, eye-movement-based measures are highlighted as quantitative, reproducible behavioral signals that provide principled constraints for individualized computational modeling. We also review the emerging impact of computational approaches on drug discovery, target prioritization, and in silico clinical trials. Finally, we examine future directions toward personalized and precision medicine in PD, emphasizing digital twin frameworks, longitudinal validation, and the integration of patient-specific data with mechanistic and data-driven models. Together, these advances underscore the growing role of computational modeling as an integrative and hypothesis-generating framework, with the long-term goal of supporting data-constrained predictive approaches for biomarker development and translational applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.