Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41750131›Full record

ReviewBrain sciences2026

Controlling Biogenesis and Engineering of Exosomes to Inhibit Growth and Promote Death in Glioblastoma Multiforme.

Srikar Alapati, Swapan K Ray

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Srikar AlapatiDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, 6439 Garners Ferry Road, Columbia, SC 29209, USA.
Swapan K RayDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, 6439 Garners Ferry Road, Columbia, SC 29209, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1734-542X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is characterized by aggressive growth, extensive vascularization, high metabolic malleability, and a striking capacity for therapy resistance. Current treatments involve surgical resection and concomitant radiation therapy and chemotherapy, prolonging survival times marginally due to the therapy resistance that is built up by the tumor cells. A growing body of research has identified exosomes as critical enablers of therapy resistance. These nanoscale vesicles enable GBM cells to disseminate oncogenic proteins, nucleic acids, and lipids that collectively promote angiogenesis, maintain autophagy under metabolic pressure, and suppress apoptosis. As interest grows in targeting tumor communication networks, exosome-based therapeutic strategies have emerged as promising avenues for improving therapeutic outcomes in GBM. This review integrates current insights into two complementary therapeutic strategies: inhibiting exosome biogenesis and secretion, and engineering exosomes as precision vehicles for the delivery of anti-tumor molecular cargo. Key molecular regulators of exosome formation-including the endosomal sorting complex required for transport (ESCRT) machinery, tumor susceptibility gene 101 (TSG101) protein, ceramide-driven pathways, and Rab GTPases-govern the sorting and release of factors that enhance GBM survival. Targeting these pathways through pharmacological or genetic means has shown promise in suppressing angiogenic signaling, disrupting autophagic flux via modulation of autophagy-related gene (ATG) proteins, and sensitizing tumor cells to apoptosis by destabilizing mitochondria and associated survival networks. In parallel, advances in exosome engineering-encompassing siRNA loading, miRNA enrichment, and small-molecule drug packaging-offer new routes for delivering therapeutic agents across the blood-brain barrier with high cellular specificity. Engineered exosomes carrying anti-angiogenic, autophagy-inhibiting, or pro-apoptotic molecules can reprogram the tumor microenvironment and activate both the intrinsic mitochondrial and extrinsic ligand-mediated apoptotic pathways. Collectively, current evidence underscores the potential of strategically modulating endogenous exosome biogenesis and harnessing exogenous engineered therapeutic exosomes to interrupt the angiogenic and autophagic circuits that underpin therapy resistance, ultimately leading to the induction of apoptotic cell death in GBM.

Indexed as

angiogenesisapoptosisautophagyexosome biogenesis and engineeringglioblastoma multiforme (GBM)therapy resistance

Identifiers

PMID41750131
PMCPMC12938720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.