Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41750124›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2026

Frontal Theta Oscillations in Perceptual Decision-Making Reflect Cognitive Control and Confidence.

Rashmi Parajuli, Eleanor Flynn, Mukesh Dhamala

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rashmi ParajuliDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA.
Eleanor FlynnDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA.
Mukesh DhamalaDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9426-6261

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPerceptual decision-making requires transforming sensory inputs into goal-directed actions under uncertainty. Neural oscillations in the theta band (3-7 Hz), particularly within frontal regions, have been implicated in cognitive control and decision confidence. However, whether changes in theta oscillations reflect greater effort during ambiguous decisions or more efficient control during clear conditions remains debated, and theta's relationship to stimulus clarity is incompletely understood. PURPOSE: This study's purpose was to examine how task difficulty modulates theta activity and how theta dynamics evolve across the decision-making process using two complementary analytical approaches.

methodsElectroencephalography (EEG) data were acquired from 26 healthy adults performing a face/house categorization task with images containing three levels of scrambled phase and Gaussian noise: clear (0%), moderate (40%), and high (55%). Theta dynamics were assessed from current source density (CSD) time courses of event-related potentials (ERPs) and single-trials. Statistical comparisons used Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with false discovery rate (FDR) correction for multiple comparisons.

resultsFrontal theta power was greater for clear than noisy face stimuli (corrected

conclusionsTheta oscillations support perceptual decision-making through stimulus clarity modulation of both phase-locked and ongoing synchronization, with evoked component dominating. These findings underscore the importance of methodological choices in EEG-based connectivity research, as different analytical approaches capture different aspects of the same neural dynamics. The pattern of stronger theta activity for clear stimuli is consistent with neural processes related to decision confidence, though confidence was not measured behaviorally.

Indexed as

cognitive controlcurrent source densityEEGfunctional connectivityimaginary coherenceperceptual decision-makingstimulus claritytheta oscillations

Identifiers

PMID41750124
PMCPMC12937794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.