Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41750101›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026

"Oh, You've Come to Visit the Yard?": Phenotypic Capital, Intragroup Marginalization, and the Gated Sanctuary in Black LGBTQ+ Communities.

Keith J Watts, Shawndaya S Thrasher, Nicole Campbell, Laneshia R Conner, Julian K Glover, Janet K Otachi, DeKeitra Griffin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Keith J WattsCollege of Social Work, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40508, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2086-272X
Shawndaya S ThrasherSchool of Social Work, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70802, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2870-4056
Nicole CampbellDarden College of Education & Professional Studies, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA 23529, USA.
Laneshia R ConnerCollege of Social Work, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40508, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5500-893X
Julian K GloverDepartment of Gender, Sexuality, and Women's Studies, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23284, USA.
Janet K OtachiKent School of Social Work and Family Science, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6403-6227
DeKeitra GriffinSchool of Social Work, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70802, USA.ORCID 0009-0005-2462-6010

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identity-based communities that share common characteristics, beliefs, and experiences (e.g., Black LGBTQ+ communities) have historically been conceptualized as protective bubbles that buffer Black LGBTQ+ individuals against the deleterious effects of systemic racism and cisheterosexism. However, this monolithic narrative often masks the internal power dynamics that divide belonging. This study explores the exclusionary dynamics embedded within these safe spaces, examining how internal hierarchies of skin tone, socioeconomic status, and gender performance function as proximal stressors. Guided by a critical constructivist paradigm, this study utilized Reflexive Thematic Analysis to analyze open-ended survey responses from 74 Black LGBTQ+ adults. Data were drawn from a larger mixed-methods study and analyzed using a six-phase recursive process to identify latent patterns of intragroup gatekeeping. The analysis revealed that the sanctuary of the community is restricted. Three primary themes emerged: (1) Phenotypic Capital and the Politics of Authenticity, where lighter skin tone triggered authenticity scrutiny and darker skin tone faced rejection based on physical appearance; (2) Socioeconomic Gatekeeping, where belonging was stratified by the cost of participation and protective insularity within working-class spaces; and (3) Policing the Binary, where rigid adherence to gender archetypes created a landscape of performance surveillance. Access to community resilience is not a universal right but a negotiated status contingent upon the payment of a resilience tax. To promote genuine health equity, researchers and practitioners working with this population must move beyond the uncritical referral to "community" and actively dismantle the internalized systems of oppression that fracture collective survival.

Indexed as

Black LGBTQ+community belongingintersectionalityintragroup marginalizationminority stressphenotypic capital

Identifiers

PMID41750101
PMCPMC12938261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.