Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41750091›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Approach or Avoidance? The Impact of Pain Expectation on Pain Empathy: An ERP Study.

Bingni Huang, Meijing Du, Jiaxian Luo, Pinchao Luo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bingni HuangSchool of Psychology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China.
Meijing DuSchool of Psychology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China.
Jiaxian LuoSchool of Psychology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China.
Pinchao LuoSchool of Psychology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China.ORCID 0009-0007-2976-6076

Funding

Humanities and Social Sciences Program of the Ministry of Education 23YJA190006Major Planning Project of Philosophy and Social Science of Guangdong Province GD23ZD17MOE (Ministry of Education in China) Major Project of Philosophy and Social Sciences Research 2025JZDZ024MOE Project of Key Research Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences in Universities 22JJD190008Research Center for Brain Cognition and Human Development of Guangdong 2024B0303390003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pain empathy plays an important role in both social bonding and defensive mechanisms, yet previous studies have mostly used non-predictive paradigms and rarely examined the effects of expectation. Using event-related potentials (ERPs), this study explored how pain expectation temporally modulates empathic responses and proposed an avoidance-approach dual-drive model. Behaviorally, participants responded faster and more accurately under pain-expectation conditions. At the neural level, greater N2 amplitudes were elicited by pain expectation, reflecting avoidance reactions driven by self-protection. In the P3 stage, two concurrent effects emerged: (1) overall P3 amplitudes decreased under pain expectation, suggesting reduced cognitive resource allocation due to avoidance; and (2) painful stimuli still evoked larger P3 amplitudes than neutral stimuli, indicating empathic engagement associated with approach motivation. These results suggest that pain empathy is not governed by a single mechanism but by a dynamic interplay between avoidance and approach motivations at different temporal stages, providing a neurophysiological framework that integrates defensive and affiliative needs in pain empathy.

Indexed as

event-related potentials (ERPs)expectationN2P3pain empathy

Identifiers

PMID41750091
PMCPMC12937809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.