ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Clinician's Experience of Working with an Intensive Outpatient Programme for Child and Adolescent Eating Disorders-A Reflexive Thematic Analysis.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The intensive outreach programme for child and adolescent eating disorders: an uncontrolled case series of clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes.Journal of eating disorders · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although intensive outpatient programmes (IOPs) are becoming more prevalent, the evidence base, particularly within the UK, remains limited. Given clinicians' central role in developing, delivering, and adapting these emerging models of care, their perspectives are essential to understanding how IOPs function in practice. This study therefore aims to address a significant gap in the literature by exploring clinicians' experiences of working with an IOP and the strengths and opportunities arising from this. Fifteen experienced clinicians participated in individual semi-structured interviews after working with the IOP. Open-ended questions guided the discussions, which were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were analysed using the six stages of reflexive thematic analysis. The analysis generated three key themes: (1) Tri-directional Collaboration, (2) Creating Space for Change, and (3) Transitions as Turning Points. Clinicians felt that the IOP provided a structure that strengthened and reinforced the therapeutic alliance between parents and clinicians, helped arrest rapid deterioration, and created space for thoughtful planning. Embedding IOPs within stepped-care frameworks may offer an effective and scalable means of expanding system capacity while delivering enhanced, flexible support during periods of heightened risk. However, longitudinal, mixed-methods evaluations are needed to clarify the sustainability of progress post-IOP and to identify predictors of positive transitions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.