Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41750061›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Examining the Relationship Between State Anxiety, Anxiety Sensitivity, and Peer Defending Using Virtual Reality.

Anna MacGillivray, Julia Byron, Ralph Redden, Laura J Lambe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anna MacGillivrayDepartment of Psychology, St. Francis Xavier University, Antigonish, NS B2G 2W5, Canada.
Julia ByronDepartment of Psychology, St. Francis Xavier University, Antigonish, NS B2G 2W5, Canada.
Ralph ReddenDepartment of Psychology, St. Francis Xavier University, Antigonish, NS B2G 2W5, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8116-8806
Laura J LambeDepartment of Psychology, St. Francis Xavier University, Antigonish, NS B2G 2W5, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7223-7854

Funding

Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council 430-2024-00508
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bullying-a form of deliberate aggressive behaviour where one peer causes harm to another in the context of a power imbalance-is among the top threats facing youth. Witnessing bullying can evoke many feelings, including anxiety, especially for individuals who have been victimized of bullying in the past. Anxiety can shape how individuals navigate social situations, including if and how bystanders intervene in bullying situations. The current study examined how previous bullying victimization, state anxiety, and anxiety sensitivity interact to influence defending behaviours while witnessing social exclusion in a virtual reality (VR) environment. Data were collected from 40 undergraduate participants who completed self-report measures and an in-lab VR task where they had the opportunity to defend against social exclusion. Although bullying victimization was unrelated to state anxiety, results of a moderated mediation model indicated that trait anxiety sensitivity moderated the link between state anxiety and peer defending. For those with low anxiety sensitivity, increased state anxiety after witnessing social exclusion predicted higher rates of defending. However, for individuals with high anxiety sensitivity, the opposite pattern was found, such that state anxiety predicted lower rates of defending. Given these findings, bullying prevention programmes should consider incorporating strategies to address anxiety sensitivity to promote peer defending.

Indexed as

anxietyanxiety sensitivitybullyingbystander interventionpeer defending

Identifiers

PMID41750061
PMCPMC12938164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.