ReviewBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
L2 Willingness to Communicate in the Context of Online Learning Environments: A Systematic Review.
Review in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Given the burgeoning interest in second language willingness to communicate (L2 WTC) in the context of second language acquisition (SLA) within online learning environments, and the current lack of systematic reviews on the topic, this study employed the PRISMA framework to conduct a comprehensive review of empirical research from January 2010 to March 2025. Through an analysis of 13 examined studies, this review synthesizes key determinants of online L2 WTC into an integrated framework comprising three interrelated dimensions: intrapersonal (e.g., trait-like affective variables and cognitive variables), mediating (state-like affective, cognitive, and interactional variables), and situational (teacher supports and online learning activities). The findings notably highlight the concentrated research attention in Asian contexts and variability in measurement approaches, while underscoring the need for more experimental, idiodynamic, and longitudinal designs to better understand the dynamics of L2 WTC in digital settings. This review identifies critical methodological gaps, offering a clearer foundation for future research in technology-mediated second language acquisition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.