Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41750033›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026

A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Motivational Dynamics and Strava Use in Active Club Runners.

Malene Rob Kolnes, Karsten Øvretveit

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Malene Rob KolnesDepartment of Education and Sports Science, Faculty of Arts and Education, University of Stavanger, 4036 Stavanger, Norway.
Karsten ØvretveitDepartment of Education and Sports Science, Faculty of Arts and Education, University of Stavanger, 4036 Stavanger, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-5528-0674

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The application Strava is widely used among runners, yet its influence on motivational processes remains unclear. This study examined endurance sport self-efficacy, achievement goals, fitness indicators, and Strava use in 225 active club runners using validated quantitative instruments and qualitative survey data. Self-efficacy and achievement goal scores were generally high. Greater endurance capacity was associated with higher self-efficacy and task-approach goals. Strava settings and subscription status were not associated with motivational outcomes; however, runners who had deleted training sessions due to perceived slow running pace scored higher on other-avoidance goals. Qualitative findings showed that Strava can enhance training through feedback, routine building, and social connection, while also introducing pressure, comparison, and stress, particularly during injury or reduced performance. Several participants reported adapting their use of the app to preserve motivation. Overall, Strava's motivational impact appears context dependent and shaped by both its features and individual usage patterns.

Indexed as

achievement goalsmotivationrunningself-efficacyStrava

Identifiers

PMID41750033
PMCPMC12938745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.