Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41750020›Full record

ReviewBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Relational Reasoning and Educational Applications.

Lindsey Engle Richland, Hongyang Zhao

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lindsey Engle RichlandSchool of Education, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697, USA.
Hongyang ZhaoDepartment of Educational Psychology, College of Education, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL 61820, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4711-0314

Funding

Institute of Education Sciences R305A240287U.S. National Science Foundation 2141411
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the global economy and sociopolitical, technological, climate, and international trade contexts continue to shift rapidly, educational goals and aims for skilled employment are changing accordingly. Research on the cognition of relational reasoning provides insight into training youth to handle these types of complex systems and multi-faceted problems. Relational reasoning is the ability to make inferences from the relationships within and between mental representations, and grounds many higher order cognitive actions such as generating solutions to novel problems, transferring insights from one context to another, and making creative leaps of inference that are central to these societal aims. This article synthesizes the theoretical and foundational literature to highlight specific practices that are relevant and implementable in enhancing all students' access to rich and complex thinking and reasoning skills. These include strategies for training students to notice and attend to relational correspondences, to use visual stimuli and language to draw connections, and to reduce the cognitive resources required to do so.

Indexed as

analogylearningrelational reasoning

Identifiers

PMID41750020
PMCPMC12938770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.