Development and Validation of the Common Prosperity Aspiration Scale: A Mixed-Methods Study in China.

Huicun Duan, Qinglong Guo, Jingfeng Han, Na Chen, Hong Chen

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Huicun DuanFaculty of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China.

Qinglong GuoFaculty of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China.

Jingfeng HanSchool of Psychology, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250358, China.

Na ChenFaculty of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China.

Hong ChenFaculty of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China.

Funding

the National Social Science Foundation of China 22&ZD184

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the increasing emphasis on residents' prosperity aspirations in rural development initiatives, the lack of a psychometrically sound measure limits comparability and rigor, as existing studies primarily focus on structural and policy factors influencing community prosperity, with insufficient attention to residents' psychological processes and subjective experiences. Drawing on community psychology, this study develops and validates a measure of rural residents' aspirations for common prosperity, integrating personal fulfillment with collective advancement across material and spiritual domains. Employing a three-phase mixed-methods design, Study 1 used in-depth interviews and grounded theory procedures (

Indexed as

common prosperity aspirationcommunity psychologymixed-methods researchrural developmentscale development

Identifiers

PMID41750012

DOI10.3390/bs16020203

PMCPMC12938126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.