Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41749994›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026

The Influence of Contextual Predictability on Word Segmentation in Chinese Reading: An Eye-Tracking Study.

Mengchuan Song, Wenxin Zhang, Yashu Cao, Jingxin Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mengchuan SongFaculty of Psychology, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387, China.
Wenxin ZhangFaculty of Psychology, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387, China.
Yashu CaoFaculty of Psychology, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387, China.
Jingxin WangFaculty of Psychology, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4225-815X

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 32271119
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Word segmentation is a fundamental component of lexical processing, and Chinese reading-lacking inter-word spacing-requires readers to identify word boundaries based on prior experience. Previous studies have shown that contextual predictability facilitates lexical identification in Chinese reading; however, its influence on word segmentation remains unclear. This study used eye-tracking to examine the relationship between contextual predictability and readers' segmentation preferences during Chinese sentence reading. Overlapping ambiguous three-character strings (e.g., ) were used as the region of interest (ROI), and a 2 (segmentation type: AB-C (e.g., /) vs. A-BC (e.g., /)) × 2 (contextual predictability: high vs. low) within-subjects design was adopted. A total of 76 native Chinese speakers completed the task. The results showed that contextual predictability had a significant effect on skipping probability: Highly predictable target character strings were skipped more often than low-predictability words. However, contextual predictability did not influence any eye-movement measure. In contrast, segmentation type produced consistent effects across all measures, with shorter reading times for AB-C than for A-BC, indicating a stable preference for two-character segmentation. More importantly, no interaction emerged between contextual predictability and segmentation type, and Bayesian model comparison further supported this conclusion. These findings suggest that Chinese reading involves a robust preference for AB-C segmentation and that contextual predictability and word segmentation operate as independent processes, with predictability exerting minimal influence on word segmentation during reading. This result supports the Chinese Reading Model (CRM).

Indexed as

contextual predictabilityoverlapping ambiguous stringsword segmentation

Identifiers

PMID41749994
PMCPMC12937972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.