ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
The Influence of Contextual Predictability on Word Segmentation in Chinese Reading: An Eye-Tracking Study.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Hierarchy of the Constituent Characters in Chinese Non-Idiomatic Three-Character Words: An Eye-Tracking Study.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Word segmentation is a fundamental component of lexical processing, and Chinese reading-lacking inter-word spacing-requires readers to identify word boundaries based on prior experience. Previous studies have shown that contextual predictability facilitates lexical identification in Chinese reading; however, its influence on word segmentation remains unclear. This study used eye-tracking to examine the relationship between contextual predictability and readers' segmentation preferences during Chinese sentence reading. Overlapping ambiguous three-character strings (e.g., ) were used as the region of interest (ROI), and a 2 (segmentation type: AB-C (e.g., /) vs. A-BC (e.g., /)) × 2 (contextual predictability: high vs. low) within-subjects design was adopted. A total of 76 native Chinese speakers completed the task. The results showed that contextual predictability had a significant effect on skipping probability: Highly predictable target character strings were skipped more often than low-predictability words. However, contextual predictability did not influence any eye-movement measure. In contrast, segmentation type produced consistent effects across all measures, with shorter reading times for AB-C than for A-BC, indicating a stable preference for two-character segmentation. More importantly, no interaction emerged between contextual predictability and segmentation type, and Bayesian model comparison further supported this conclusion. These findings suggest that Chinese reading involves a robust preference for AB-C segmentation and that contextual predictability and word segmentation operate as independent processes, with predictability exerting minimal influence on word segmentation during reading. This result supports the Chinese Reading Model (CRM).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.