ReviewCancers2026
Innovations in Cutaneous Oncology and Dermatologic Surgery: From Margin Control to Integrated Precision Oncology.
Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cutaneous oncology is undergoing a major transformation driven by advances in tumour biology, immunotherapy, targeted agents, and locoregional technologies. Although surgery remains the cornerstone of curative treatment for most skin cancers, an increasing proportion of patients present with high-risk, locally advanced, recurrent, or biologically aggressive disease that challenges a surgery-only paradigm. In this evolving landscape, dermatologic surgery has transitioned from a standalone intervention to a central component of integrated precision oncology. This narrative review provides a clinically oriented synthesis of recent innovations in cutaneous oncology and dermatologic surgery, with a focus on risk-adapted surgical decision-making and multidisciplinary treatment sequencing. We examine the evolving role of margin-controlled and function-preserving techniques, particularly Mohs micrographic surgery, and define clinical scenarios in which standard excision, Mohs surgery, radiotherapy, systemic therapy, or combined approaches are preferred. Quantitative outcome data from pivotal trials are incorporated where available, including local control, recurrence risk, response rates, and survival outcomes. Across major cutaneous malignancies-basal cell carcinoma, cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, melanoma, and selected rare tumours-we discuss how targeted therapies, immune checkpoint inhibitors, radiotherapy, and locoregional treatments are increasingly integrated with surgery in neoadjuvant, adjuvant, consolidative, and salvage settings. Particular attention is given to treatment-related toxicities, patient selection, and the implications of systemic therapy on surgical timing, reconstruction, and morbidity. High-risk populations, including immunosuppressed patients, are specifically addressed. By outlining adaptive therapeutic algorithms and emphasizing multidisciplinary collaboration, this review highlights the expanding role of the dermatologic surgeon in modern oncology. Surgery remains indispensable for local control and cure; however, its greatest impact now lies in strategic integration with systemic and locoregional therapies to optimise oncologic outcomes, preserve function, and deliver personalised, patient-centred care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.