ReviewCancers2026
Menin Inhibition in Acute Myeloid MLL Rearranged Leukemias: A New Target for Precision Care.
Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Defining and managing high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in 2026.Annals of hematology · 2026Review
- Menin Inhibition in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Rewiring Leukemic Transcriptional Networks.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Menin inhibitors are the first targeted therapies for KMT2A-rearranged and NPM1-mutated acute leukemias, addressing a significant unmet need in these high-risk subtypes. Revumenib received approval in 2024-2025 for relapsed or refractory KMT2A-rearranged acute leukemia and NPM1-mutated AML. The AUG-MENT-101 trial reported a 23% composite complete remission rate in heavily pretreated patients, with 61% of responders achieving MRD negativity. Several menin inhibitors, including ziftomenib, bleximenib, and enzomenib, are in clinical development. They demonstrate similar efficacy, but their safety profiles differ, especially regarding QTc prolongation and coverage of resistance mutations. Combination therapies with azacitidine and venetoclax or intensive chemotherapy have achieved high response rates in newly diagnosed patients, supporting their potential use in frontline treatment. Acquired resistance, often due to MEN1 mutations at the drug-binding interface, occurs in about 40% of cases. Distinct resistance patterns among menin inhibitors suggest the possibility of sequential therapy. Approximately 30-40% of responders in relapsed or refractory trials proceeded to allogeneic transplantation, which remains a key pathway to potential cure. This review examines the molecular mechanisms of the menin-KMT2A interaction, and summarizes clinical trial data on the efficacy and safety of menin inhibitors as monotherapy and in combination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.