ReviewCancers2026
Reducing Complications in Pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pancreatic surgery is a technically demanding field associated with frequent morbidity, with pancreatic fistula representing the dominant driver of major complications in pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Although refinements in operative technique, perioperative management, and institutional systems have contributed to incremental improvements, the overall incidence of clinically relevant complications has remained largely unchanged over recent decades. This narrative review provides a comprehensive overview of current strategies aimed at reducing morbidity and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy, focusing on modifiable technical, pharmacological, nutritional, and systems-based interventions, whilst acknowledging the underlying biological determinants that remain difficult to alter. This review synthesises contemporary evidence on fistula risk modelling, anastomotic reconstruction, and adjunctive operative techniques. The role of pharmacological interventions is examined alongside an evaluation of perioperative nutritional optimisation and enhanced recovery frameworks. Systems-based strategies such as centralisation, failure-to-rescue performance, protocolised pathways, and algorithm-driven postoperative surveillance are highlighted as emerging areas with substantial potential to impact survival independently of complication rates. Finally, this review explores future directions, including radiomics-based risk stratification, intraoperative imaging, and tailored postoperative care. Together, these domains provide a platform for reducing complication severity, standardising postoperative care, and ultimately improving patient outcomes. By integrating these perspectives, this review aims to present a comprehensive and in-depth narrative of how to reduce complications in pancreas surgery. Overall, this narrative review proposes that meaningful improvements in outcomes after PD likely do not arise from the elimination of complications altogether, but rather from improved prediction, prevention where possible, and critically, more effective systems of care that reduce the severity and consequences of complications when they occur.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.