ReviewCancers2026
Vascular Resection, Reconstruction, and Divestment in Pancreatoduodenectomy: Expanding Boundaries in Pancreatic Cancer Surgery.
Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vascular resection and reconstruction during pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) have evolved from rare and controversial procedures into essential components of surgical management for selected patients with locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Venous resection is now widely accepted and routinely performed in high-volume centers, whereas arterial resection and artery-sparing divestment remain selectively applied because of their technical demands and concerns regarding perioperative risk and oncologic benefit. Accumulating contemporary evidence indicates that venous resection can be performed with acceptable safety, with 30-day mortality rates generally ranging from 3% to 5% and median overall survival of approximately 18-26 months when margin-negative (R0) resection is achieved. Arterial resections, most commonly involving the common hepatic, celiac, or superior mesenteric arteries, have been increasingly utilized in highly selected patients, particularly following neoadjuvant therapy, achieving R0 resection rates of approximately 65-75% and median overall survival of 20-28 months. Arterial divestment has emerged as a promising artery-sparing strategy, offering comparable oncologic outcomes with reduced surgical morbidity in appropriately selected cases. Collectively, these advances have expanded the boundaries of resectability in PDAC, enabling surgical intervention in patients previously deemed inoperable. Venous resection is now considered an oncologically sound extension of standard PD, whereas arterial resection and divestment should remain restricted to carefully selected patients demonstrating favorable biologic behavior and response to neoadjuvant therapy. Future progress in this field will likely depend on improved biologic stratification, enhanced intraoperative perfusion assessment, and the integration of hybrid open and endovascular techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.