ReviewCancers2026
The Impact of the Number of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Cycles on Outcomes in Advanced Ovarian Cancer: A Narrative Review.
Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although standard chemotherapy for three to four cycles followed by surgery is considered safe and effective in the management of advanced ovarian cancer, the impact of extending treatment beyond this period remains uncertain. Some authors suggest that the number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles does not directly affect prognosis and may reflect a confounding bias. Others, however, indicate that a prolonged exposure to chemotherapy can promote the selection of resistant tumor clones, negatively influencing patient survival and disease progression. This review aims to summarize the current evidence on the topic, evaluating the effect of prolonged chemotherapy on surgical cytoreduction and survival. To achieve this, we conducted an analysis of the English-language literature available in PubMed, focusing on treatment duration, achievement of complete surgical resection, survival outcomes, and prognostic factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.