ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Advances in Decellularization of Fish Wastes for Extracellular Matrix Extraction in Sustainable Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine.
Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Decellularization removes immunogenic intracellular components of fish tissues while keeping the extracellular matrix (dECM) structure, mechanical integrity, and bioactivity. Fish-derived dECM retains native bioactive components, exhibiting high biocompatibility, low immunogenicity, and biodegradability, while supporting cell adhesion, proliferation, and tissue regeneration. Due to its abundance, minimal ethical concerns, and low zoonotic risks, fish wastes are emerging as sustainable sources of dECM, offering an eco-friendly alternative to mammalian biomaterials. This review highlights advances in decellularizing fish wastes such as skin, scales, bones, viscera, and swim bladders from species including tilapia, tuna, milkfish, carp, goldfish, and sturgeon. Physical, chemical, biological, and hybrid decellularization methods are assessed for cell removal, ECM preservation, and mechanical performance. Recent advances in polymer-dECM composites, crosslinking, and 3D bioprinting have significantly improved scaffold performance, making fish-derived dECM applicable for healing of wounds, regeneration of bone and cartilage, and repair of soft tissues. Despite its potential, challenges remain in optimizing perfusion rates, temperature variations, and tissue-specific protocols, as well as developing eco-friendly decellularization techniques using biodegradable reagents. Future perspectives include expanding decellularized fish tissue sources, innovating bio-inks for 3D bioprinting, and refining tissue-specific processing methods to maximize the potential of fish-derived dECM in regenerative medicine and tissue engineering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.