ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Mesenchymal Stem Cell Sheet Engineering: Refining Cell Delivery Strategies in Regenerative Medicine.
Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been widely investigated in regenerative medicine owing to their immunomodulatory activity, paracrine signaling, and multilineage differentiation potential. However, accumulating clinical and preclinical evidence indicates that conventional MSC therapies based on single-cell injection often produce transient benefits due to rapid post-transplant cell loss and poor engraftment. These observations suggest that the limited efficacy of MSC therapy is not determined solely by cell type or disease context but may also be influenced by the delivery strategy. In this review, we focus on MSC-based cell sheet studies as an approach to improve cell retention and therapeutic persistence. Building on the clinical validation of cell sheet technology, we critically summarize preclinical evidence across distinct tissue environments. Preclinical studies in cardiac and cutaneous repair models demonstrate that MSC sheets enhance cell retention, sustain paracrine signaling, and promote tissue-level regeneration. Together, these findings highlight that effective MSC sheet therapy requires organ-specific, cell-source-dependent design strategies rather than a uniform approach across tissues. Finally, we propose that the MSC sheet engineering represents not a technical adjustment, but a conceptual shift from transient cell delivery toward structurally integrated, tissue-level regeneration engineering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.