Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41749778›Full record

ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Advances in the Measurement and Interpretation of Intervertebral Motion in the Lumbar Spine: A Scoping Review.

Alan Breen, Alexander Breen, Jonathan Branney, Alister du Rose, Mehdi Nematimoez

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Recent Findings and Developments in Spine Biomechanics.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alan BreenFaculty of Science and Technology, Bournemouth University, Poole BH12 5B, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4340-9167
Alexander BreenFaculty of Science and Technology, Bournemouth University, Poole BH12 5B, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9983-5363
Jonathan BranneyFaculty of Health, Environment and Medical Sciences, Bournemouth University, Poole BH8 8GP, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2102-8435
Alister du RoseAECC School of Chiropractic, Health Sciences University, 13-15 Parkwood Road, Bournemouth BH5 2DF, UK.
Mehdi NematimoezInstitute for Advanced Biomechanics and Motion Studies, Offenburg University, Max Planck Str. 1, 77656 Offenburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1370-7182

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntervertebral motion is a fundamental aspect of spinal biomechanics, crucial for understanding lumbar spine function, pain mechanisms, and surgical outcomes. Various methods exist for measuring and interpreting it, each with its own advantages, limitations, and specific applications. However, a comprehensive and standard taxonomy of study types for the measurement and interpretation of in vivo intervertebral motion in the lumbar spine is lacking.

objectivesThis review aimed to systematically identify, characterise, and categorise the diverse study types deposited in the literature. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Only studies in English and of lumbar spine intervertebral motion in living subjects were considered, and only those that employed objective measurement of motion sequences were included. SOURCES OF EVIDENCE: A comprehensive literature search was performed in PubMed, CINAHL, and SCOPUS for articles published between January 2000 and October 2025. CHARTING

methodsAfter removal of duplicates, all studies were subjected to Title and abstract screening, followed by full-text screening of potentially eligible studies. Data selected were charted into tables under the headings: author, year, country, purpose, technology, participants, measurement, interpretation, radiation dosage, and significance of findings.

resultsForty-nine studies were abstracted and are described under 11 study types. These formed a taxonomy constituting the following six categories: normal biomechanical mechanisms, pathological and injury mechanisms, direct kinematic measurement, spinal stabilisation, dynamic radiography, and clinical markers. The resulting taxonomy will serve as a resource for researchers, clinicians, and policymakers by facilitating a more coherent understanding of the field and promoting standardisation in research design and reporting.

Indexed as

humaninterpretationintervertebral motionlumbar spinemeasurement

Identifiers

PMID41749778
PMCPMC12937696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.