Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41749754›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Comparative Evaluation of DeepLabCut Convolutional Neural Network Architectures for High-Precision Markerless Tracking in the Mouse Staircase Test.

Valentin Fernandez, Landoline Bonnin, Afsaneh Gaillard, Christine Fernandez-Maloigne

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Valentin FernandezLNEC INSERM U1084, University of Poitiers, 86073 Poitiers, France.
Landoline BonninLMA CNRS 7348, University of Poitiers, 86073 Poitiers, France.
Afsaneh GaillardLNEC INSERM U1084, University of Poitiers, 86073 Poitiers, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9375-6506
Christine Fernandez-MaloigneXLIM CNRS 7252, University of Poitiers, 86073 Poitiers, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4818-9327

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Precise quantification of fine motor behaviour is essential for understanding neural circuit function and for evaluating therapeutic interventions in neurological disorders. While markerless pose estimation frameworks such as DeepLabCut (DLC) have transformed behavioural phenotyping, the choice of convolutional neural network (CNN) backbone has a critical impact on tracking performance, particularly in tasks involving small distal joints and frequent occlusions. In this study, we present the first systematic comparison of nine CNN architectures implemented in DLC for lateral-view analysis of skilled reaching movements in the Montoya Staircase test, a gold-standard assay for forelimb dexterity in rodent models of stroke and neurodegenerative disease. Using a dataset comprising both control and primary motor cortex (M1)-lesioned mice, we evaluated model performance across six key dimensions: spatial accuracy (RMSE, PCK@5 px), mean average precision (mAP), robustness to occlusions, inference speed, and GPU memory usage. Our results demonstrate that multi-scale DLCRNet architectures substantially outperform conventional backbones. DLCRNet_ms5 achieved the highest overall accuracy, while DLCRNet_stride16_ms5 provided the most favourable balance between precision and computational efficiency. These findings provide practical methodological guidance for neuroscience laboratories and highlight the importance of CNN architecture selection for the reliable quantification of fine motor behaviour in preclinical research.

Indexed as

convolutional neural networks (CNN)DeepLabCutkinematic analysismarkerless trackingmotor cortex lesionneurobehavioural assessmentpose estimationstaircase test

Identifiers

PMID41749754
PMCPMC12937725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.