Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41749741›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Development and Biomechanical Evaluation of a Modular Knee Prosthesis: From Conceptual V1 Design to an Improved V3 Model.

Samal Abdreshova, Sayat Akhmejanov, Kassymbek Ozhikenov, Nursultan Zhetenbayev, Yerkebulan Nurgizat, Dauren Bizhanov, Aidos Sultan, Abu-Alim Ayazbay, Meruert Zharmagambetova, Gani Sergazin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Samal AbdreshovaDepartment Aerospace and Electronic Engineering, Almaty University of Power Engineering and Telecommunications, Almaty 050013, Kazakhstan.
Sayat AkhmejanovDepartment of Robotics and Technical Tools of Automation, Satbayev University, Almaty 050013, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0002-0467-1667
Kassymbek OzhikenovDepartment of Robotics and Technical Tools of Automation, Satbayev University, Almaty 050013, Kazakhstan.
Nursultan ZhetenbayevDepartment Aerospace and Electronic Engineering, Almaty University of Power Engineering and Telecommunications, Almaty 050013, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0003-3358-1182
Yerkebulan NurgizatDepartment Aerospace and Electronic Engineering, Almaty University of Power Engineering and Telecommunications, Almaty 050013, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0002-9712-5592
Dauren BizhanovDepartment Aerospace and Electronic Engineering, Almaty University of Power Engineering and Telecommunications, Almaty 050013, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0009-0004-6823-5276
Aidos SultanDepartment of Robotics and Technical Tools of Automation, Satbayev University, Almaty 050013, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0001-7548-2954
Abu-Alim AyazbayDepartment Aerospace and Electronic Engineering, Almaty University of Power Engineering and Telecommunications, Almaty 050013, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0002-5941-3462
Meruert ZharmagambetovaDepartment of Science and Innovations, Mukhametzhan Tynyshbayev ALT University, Almaty 050013, Kazakhstan.
Gani SergazinDepartment of Science and Innovations, Mukhametzhan Tynyshbayev ALT University, Almaty 050013, Kazakhstan.

Funding

This research was funded by the Science Committee of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan Grant № BR24992820
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates the functional capabilities and accessibility limitations of current knee prostheses while developing and evaluating a three-stage prosthetic system (V1-V3). The primary objective is to design a cost-effective knee prosthesis featuring anatomically compatible motion, high kinematic accuracy, and a modular architecture. The methodology integrates a technical review of commercial prostheses, CAD modeling in SolidWorks, kinematic evaluation through Motion Simulation, and experimental testing of the V2 prototype. The results demonstrate the structural limitations of the initial V1 design, the complete assembly and improved functional performance of the V2 prototype, and the advanced mechanical behavior achieved in the final V3 concept. The V3 model provides an extended range of motion, reduced mass and lowered center of gravity, smoother dynamic response, and compatibility with a fully modular foot-ankle-knee configuration. Overall, the findings indicate that the V3 design represents a promising engineering solution that brings the system closer to clinical applicability and establishes a foundation for the development of a fully modular lower-limb prosthetic platform.

Indexed as

biomechanical designCAD modellingkinematic analysisknee prosthesislower-limb prostheticsmodular prosthetic systemmotion simulation

Identifiers

PMID41749741
PMCPMC12937899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.