Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41749734›Full record

ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Digital and Intelligent Rehabilitation Technologies in Stroke and Neurological Disorders: A Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence, Virtual Reality, Gamification, and Emerging Therapeutic Platforms in Neurorehabilitation.

Majeda M El-Banna, Moattar Raza Rizvi, Waqas Sami, Ankita Sharma, Rushdy R Atyeh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Majeda M El-BannaCollege of Nursing, Health Sector, Qatar University, Doha P.O. Box 2713, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0003-4661-0608
Moattar Raza RizviAllied Health Science, Santosh Deemed to be University, Santosh Nagar, Ghaziabad 201009, Uttar Pradesh, India.ORCID 0000-0001-8424-7163
Waqas SamiDepartment of Pre-Clinical Affairs, College of Nursing, QU-Health Sector, Qatar University, Doha P.O. Box 2713, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0001-7948-1190
Ankita SharmaDepartment of Physiotherapy, Amity Institute of Health Allied Sciences, Amity University, Noida 201313, Uttar Pradesh, India.ORCID 0000-0002-8742-381X
Rushdy R AtyehSchool of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid 22110, Jordan.ORCID 0009-0005-9401-9689

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI), virtual reality (VR), gamification, and telerehabilitation are increasingly incorporated into neurorehabilitation to deliver adaptive, personalized, and remotely accessible interventions for individuals with stroke and other neurological disorders. These technologies aim to address key limitations in conventional rehabilitation by enhancing training intensity, patient engagement, accessibility, and real-time monitoring. This systematic review synthesizes evidence from clinical and simulation-based studies evaluating AI-assisted systems, non-AI gamified platforms, VR/exergames, telerehabilitation models, and simulation-driven architectures across neurological populations. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science (2010-2025) identified randomized controlled trials, pilot and quasi-experimental studies, telerehabilitation systems, VR/exergame interventions, AI-based adaptive tools, and computational or model-driven investigations, guided by a revised PICO framework. Data were extracted using a standardized template, with studies categorized by design, population, technological modality, and outcome domain. Risk of bias was assessed using validated tools, and GRADE was applied to stroke-specific clinical outcomes. Twenty-two studies met the inclusion criteria, encompassing both clinical trials and simulation/modeling research. Clinical studies reported improvements in motor function, balance, gait, swallowing, cognition, and psychosocial well-being, often accompanied by high usability and adherence. AI-enabled systems facilitated adaptive difficulty adjustment, automated feedback, and individualized progression, while non-AI platforms demonstrated strong engagement and meaningful functional gains. Simulation studies provided valuable insights into algorithm behavior, sensor-based modeling, and system optimization. Despite promising multi-domain benefits, methodological heterogeneity, limited long-term follow-up, and inconsistent AI transparency remain key challenges, underscoring the need for standardized outcomes, explainable AI, inclusive design, and robust multicenter trials.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceextended realityneurorehabilitationsystematic literature reviewwearable devices

Identifiers

PMID41749734
PMCPMC12937938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.