ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A Systematic Review of Contrastive Learning in Medical AI: Foundations, Biomedical Modalities, and Future Directions.
Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A CLIP-based framework for multiclass lung histopathology classification with prompt engineering and class-imbalance-aware focal optimization.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Surgical Video Understanding with Alignment-Preserving Temporal Adaptation and Action Triplet Text Alignment.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Robust Multi-Site ADHD Classification via GraphSAGE-Based Functional Connectivity Modeling from rs-fMRI.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Deep Learning-Assisted Early Detection of Skin Cancer from Dermoscopic Images in Underserved Clinical Settings.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Neuro-semantic graph fusion for explainable depression risk trajectory mapping using a graph-enhanced RoBERTa framework.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Social friction vs. cognitive efficiency: A comparative analysis of help-seeking behaviors in human communities and generative AI.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Medical artificial intelligence (AI) systems depend heavily on high-quality data representations to support accurate prediction, diagnosis, and clinical decision-making. However, the availability of large, well-annotated medical datasets is often constrained by cost, privacy concerns, and the need for expert labeling, motivating growing interest in self-supervised representation learning. Among these approaches, contrastive learning has emerged as one of the most influential paradigms, driving major advances in representation learning across computer vision and natural language processing. This paper presents a comprehensive review of contrastive learning in medical AI, highlighting its theoretical foundations, methodological developments, and practical applications in medical imaging, electronic health records, physiological signal analysis, and genomics. Furthermore, we identify recurring challenges, including pair construction, sensitivity to data augmentations, and inconsistencies in evaluation protocols, while discussing emerging trends such as multimodal alignment, federated learning, and privacy-preserving frameworks. Through a synthesis of current developments and open research directions, this review provides insights to advance data-efficient, reliable, and generalizable medical AI systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.