Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41749709›Full record

ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Scaffolds and Stem Cells Show Promise for TMJ Regeneration: A Systematic Review.

Miljana Nedeljkovic, Gvozden Rosic, Dragica Selakovic, Jovana Milanovic, Aleksandra Arnaut, Milica Vasiljevic, Nemanja Jovicic, Lidija Veljkovic, Pavle Milanovic, Momir Stevanovic

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Miljana NedeljkovicDepartment of Dentistry, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, 34000 Kragujevac, Serbia.ORCID 0009-0006-7590-4014
Gvozden RosicDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, 34000 Kragujevac, Serbia.
Dragica SelakovicDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, 34000 Kragujevac, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0001-8264-2477
Jovana MilanovicDepartment of Dentistry, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, 34000 Kragujevac, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0003-0671-3784
Aleksandra ArnautDepartment of Dentistry, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, 34000 Kragujevac, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0003-0718-7421
Milica VasiljevicDepartment of Dentistry, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, 34000 Kragujevac, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0003-1039-1028
Nemanja JovicicDepartment of Histology and Embryology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, 34000 Kragujevac, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0003-1697-8380
Lidija VeljkovicDepartment of Dentistry, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, 34000 Kragujevac, Serbia.ORCID 0009-0003-1306-1494
Pavle MilanovicDepartment of Dentistry, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, 34000 Kragujevac, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0001-6430-4562
Momir StevanovicDepartment of Dentistry, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, 34000 Kragujevac, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0002-4665-4566

Funding

Faculty of Medical Sciences, Univerity of Kragujevac, Serbia. JP 05/22
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorders represent chronic degenerative musculoskeletal conditions with a high prevalence in the general population and limited regenerative treatment options. Owing to the insufficient efficacy of current conservative and surgical therapies, there is a growing clinical need for biologically based regenerative approaches. Tissue engineering (TE), particularly scaffold-based strategies, has emerged as a promising avenue for TMJ regeneration. This systematic review analyzed preclinical in vivo studies investigating scaffold-based interventions for TMJ disc and osteochondral repair. A structured literature search of PubMed and Scopus databases identified 39 eligible studies. Extracted data included scaffold composition, use of cellular and bioactive components, animal models, and reported histological, radiological, and functional outcomes. Natural scaffolds, such as decellularized extracellular matrix and collagen-based hydrogels, demonstrated favorable biocompatibility and support for fibrocartilaginous regeneration, whereas synthetic materials including polycaprolactone, poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid), and polyvinyl alcohol provided superior mechanical stability and structural tunability. Cells were used in 17/39 studies (43%); quantitative improvements were variably reported across these studies. Bioactive molecule delivery, including transforming growth factor-β, histatin-1, and platelet-rich plasma, further enhanced tissue regeneration, while emerging drug- and gene-delivery approaches showed potential for modulating local inflammation. Despite encouraging results, the reviewed studies exhibited substantial heterogeneity in experimental design, outcome measures, and animal models, limiting direct comparison and translational interpretation. Scaffold-based approaches show preclinical promise but heterogeneity in design and incomplete quantitative reporting limit definitive conclusions. Future research should emphasize standardized methodologies, long-term functional evaluation, and the use of clinically relevant large-animal models to facilitate translation toward clinical application. However, functional and biomechanical outcomes were inconsistently reported and rarely standardized, preventing robust conclusions regarding the relationship between structural regeneration and restoration of TMJ function.

Indexed as

cartilagecartilage engineeringmandibular condylescaffoldsstem cellsystematic reviewtemporomandibular jointtemporomandibular joint disktemporomandibular joint disorderstissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID41749709
PMCPMC12938102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.