Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41749694›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Watershed Encoder-Decoder Neural Network for Nuclei Segmentation of Breast Cancer Histology Images.

Vincent Majanga, Ernest Mnkandla, Donatien Koulla Moulla, Sree Thotempudi, Attipoe David Sena

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Vincent MajangaDepartment of Computer Science, University of South Africa, Preller Street, Muckleneuk Ridge, Pretoria 1709, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-7804-364X
Ernest MnkandlaDepartment of Computer Science, University of South Africa, Preller Street, Muckleneuk Ridge, Pretoria 1709, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-3989-5617
Donatien Koulla MoullaDepartment of Computer Science, University of South Africa, Preller Street, Muckleneuk Ridge, Pretoria 1709, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-6594-8378
Sree ThotempudiDepartment of Computer Science, University of South Africa, Preller Street, Muckleneuk Ridge, Pretoria 1709, South Africa.
Attipoe David SenaDepartment of Computer Science, University of South Africa, Preller Street, Muckleneuk Ridge, Pretoria 1709, South Africa.

Funding

University of South Africa N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, deep learning methods have seen major advancements and are preferred for medical image analysis. Clinically, deep learning techniques for cancer image analysis are among the main applications for early diagnosis, detection, and treatment. Consequently, segmentation of breast histology images is a key step towards diagnosing breast cancer. However, the use of deep learning methods for image analysis is constrained by challenging features in the histology images. These challenges include poor image quality, complex microscopic tissue structures, topological intricacies, and boundary/edge inhomogeneity. Furthermore, this leads to a limited number of images required for analysis. The U-Net model was introduced and gained significant traction for its ability to produce high-accuracy results with very few input images. Many modifications of the U-Net architecture exist. Therefore, this study proposes the watershed encoder-decoder neural network (WEDN) to segment cancerous lesions in supervised breast histology images. Pre-processing of supervised breast histology images via augmentation is introduced to increase the dataset size. The augmented dataset is further enhanced and segmented into the region of interest. Data enhancement methods such as thresholding, opening, dilation, and distance transform are used to highlight foreground and background pixels while removing unwanted parts from the image. Consequently, further segmentation via the connected component analysis method is used to combine image pixel components with similar intensity values and assign them their respective labeled binary masks. The watershed filling method is then applied to these labeled binary mask components to separate and identify the edges/boundaries of the regions of interest (cancerous lesions). This resultant image information is sent to the WEDN model network for feature extraction and learning via training and testing. Residual convolutional block layers of the WEDN model are the learnable layers that extract the region of interest (ROI), which is the cancerous lesion. The method was evaluated on 3000 images-watershed masks, an augmented dataset. The model was trained on 2400 training set images and tested on 600 testing set images. This proposed method produced significant results of 98.53% validation accuracy, 96.98% validation dice coefficient, and 97.84% validation intersection over unit (IoU) metric scores.

Indexed as

augmentationdeep learningoptimizationwatershed segmentation

Identifiers

PMID41749694
PMCPMC12937963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.