Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41749690›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026

The Effects of Ovine-Derived Reinforced Tissue Matrix Surrounding Silicone-Based Implants in a Rat Prepectoral Reconstruction Model.

Sai L Pinni, Cameron Martin, Nicholas Fadell, Xiaochao Xia, Evan Marsh, Lauren Schellhardt, Xiaowei Li, Matthew D Wood, Justin M Sacks

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sai L PinniDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2361-1627
Cameron MartinDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Nicholas FadellDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Xiaochao XiaDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5764-0293
Evan MarshDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Lauren SchellhardtDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Xiaowei LiDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0714-1140
Matthew D WoodDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8132-6827
Justin M SacksDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1218-6079

Funding

TELA Bio N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Silicone-based implants have been widely used in breast reconstruction but have also been associated with poorly understood complications, including pathologic foreign body responses such as capsular contracture. In this study, we leveraged 3D-printing technology to generate silicone-based implants in a novel, anatomically relevant, prepectoral rat model. We used this model to evaluate the response to an extracellular matrix-based product: ovine-derived reinforced tissue matrix (RTM). Two-piece negative molds were developed through computer-aided design and 3D-printed. The molds were filled with various polydimethylsiloxane mixtures and dip-coated to fabricate implants. Implant material characterization revealed that the implants retained the original 3D-printed mold shape and qualitatively demonstrated a shell with an inner solid gel-like structure. Fabricated implants had smooth surfaces, as well as tunable features including implant stiffness (storage modulus). From initial studies in our rat model, placement of bilateral prepectoral implants allowed assessment of both muscle- and skin-facing capsules and were well-tolerated for at least 12 weeks. Comparison of the foreign body response between RTM-covered and uncovered (control) implants in this model revealed that the capsule thickness did not differ between groups at the 12-week endpoint. However, RTM reduced contractile fibroblasts (alpha-smooth muscle actin) and macrophages (Iba1) compared to the control. Our findings suggested that RTM may improve capsule quality by attenuating cells involved in fibrosis, even when total capsule thickness remains unchanged. However, these changes to cells involved in fibrosis were only observed at this early endpoint and may not predict long-term clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

3D printingacellular dermal matrixbreast implantcapsuleforeign body responserat modelsilicone

Identifiers

PMID41749690
PMCPMC12937910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.