ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Predicting Intrapartum Acidemia: A Review of Approaches Based on Fetal Heart Rate.
Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fetal acidemia, caused by impaired gas exchange between the fetus and the mother, is a leading cause of stillbirth and neurologic complications. Early prediction is therefore essential to guide timely clinical intervention. Several strategies rely on cardiotocography (CTG), which combines fetal heart rate (fHR) with uterine contractions and has led to development of clinical guidelines for CTG interpretation and the introduction of different fHR features. Additionally, ST event analysis, investigating changes in the ST segments of the fetal electrocardiogram (fECG), has been proposed as a complementary tool. This narrative review adopts a systematic approach, with comprehensive searches in Embase and PubMed to ensure full coverage of the available literature, and summarizes findings from 30 studies. Clinical guidelines for CTG interpretation frequently lead to intermediate risk level annotations, leaving the final decision regarding fetal management to clinical experience. In contrast, various fHR features can successfully discriminate between fetuses developing acidemia and healthy controls. Evidence regarding the added value of ST events derived from the scalp electrode remains conflicting, due to concerns about invasiveness. Recent studies on machine learning models highlight their ability to integrate multiple fHR features and improve predictive performance, suggesting a promising direction for enhancing acidemia prediction during labor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.