ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Can Machines Identify Pain Effects? A Machine Learning Proof of Concept to Identify EMG Pain Signature.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study introduces a machine-learning-based approach for identifying "pain signatures" using electromyography data from volunteers undergoing acute pain. Leveraging the XGBoost algorithm, our method analyzes electromyography features (variance, mean absolute deviation, integral, peak, and entropy) to classify muscle contractions as painful or non-painful. Fifteen participants performed controlled elbow flexion tasks under three conditions: during painful and painless conditions. The results revealed that electromyographic peak and integral activity were key predictors of pain states, with the model achieving 73% sensitivity in distinguishing painful from painless conditions. Interestingly, placebo-induced responses with less intense pain exhibited muscular adaptations similar to, but less extensive than, those observed under actual pain. These findings underscore the potential of machine learning to enhance pain assessment by providing a non-verbal, objective method for analyzing neuromuscular adaptations, paving the way for personalized pain management and more accurate monitoring of musculoskeletal health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.