ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Design and Validation of a Multi-Modal Bioreactor System: Assessing the Effects of Perfusion and Cyclic Tensile Stimulation on Mechanical and Biological Properties of 3D-Printed Missing-Rib Auxetic Scaffolds.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bioreactors used for the maturation of cell-seeded tissue-engineered scaffolds should essentially mimic the dynamic in vivo environments experienced by the native tissues they intend to substitute. In addition to perfusion of growth medium to facilitate continuous mass transfer, application of appropriate mechanical stimulation is important to enhance cellular responses in scaffolds for tissues such as tendons, skin, and cardiac muscle that experience dynamic loading. This study focuses on the development of a multi-modal custom bioreactor capable of applying cyclic tensile stimulation and perfusion within physiologically relevant ranges while minimizing shear stress detrimental to cells seeded on scaffolds. To validate the bioreactor design and operation, we assessed the effects of tensile stimulation (0.1 Hz, 2000 cycles/day) and perfusion (media flow rate = 0.15 mL/min) over 21 days on the biofunctional performance of 3D-bioplotted polycaprolactone (PCL) auxetic scaffolds with a representative design (missing-rib pattern) characterized by negative Poisson's ratio similar to the aforementioned soft tissues. The scaffold had a tensile yield strain of 9.14%, yield strength of 0.25 MPa, elastic modulus of 2.85 MPa, and ultimate tensile strength (UTS) of 1.32 MPa. The application of perfusion and tensile stimulation (0-5% cyclic strain) for 21 days did not adversely affect the yield strength and elastic modulus of the scaffold but affected its UTS (22.5% decrease) compared to the control cultured without perfusion or stimulation. Notably, it resulted in significantly improved fibroblast cellular responses (DNA = 29 µg/g sample and collagen = 371.78 µg/g sample) compared to the control (7.52 µg/g sample and 163.51 µg/g sample, respectively). These results validate the bioreactor system operation and the ability of multi-modal stimulation to control biofunctional responses of auxetic scaffolds, which will serve as the basis for future studies that will optimize auxetic scaffold design and dynamic culture parameters for NPR tissue-specific applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.