ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Physiologically Guided Modeling for EEG Multichannel Signals.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings often exhibit strong interchannel correlations due to scalp potentials reflecting electric fields generated by localized neural sources commonly modeled as current dipoles. Despite this physiological basis, many widely used approaches (e.g., independent component analysis) are largely data-driven, may require many components, and offer limited interpretability and limited support for assessing physiological assumptions. We propose a physiologically guided multichannel model built on a parametric Frequency-Modulated Möbius (FMM) formulation, where each electrode signal is expressed as a linear combination of a small number of latent dipole-related sources with parametrically described trajectories. The resulting framework captures temporal and spatial structure with high accuracy and enables likelihood-based testing of the fixed dipole-orientation assumption through a reduced-rank formulation. Using publicly available EEG data, we illustrate that the proposed approach explains interchannel dependence with few latent sources and provides statistical evidence regarding the plausibility of fixed orientation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.