ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Chaotic Dynamics Analysis of Magnetocardiography Signals for Early Detection of Myocardial Ischemia.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The heart exhibits inherently nonlinear and chaotic electrical dynamics, making the early detection of myocardial ischemia (MI) challenging using traditional electrocardiography (ECG) or standard magnetocardiography (MCG). In this study, we propose an engineering-oriented framework that integrates classical nonlinear dynamics with machine-learning-based analysis, termed the Magnetocardiography Chaotic Dynamics Map (MCDM), to reconstruct nonlinear phase-space trajectories from 36-channel MCG recordings and capture differences in reconstructed nonlinear dynamics associated with ischemic conditions. Morphological and quantitative analyses of the MCDM patterns reveal marked differences between healthy and ischemic subjects. Using a machine-learning classifier trained on HOG and LBP descriptors, the proposed MCDM-based model achieved an accuracy of 92.19%, a sensitivity of 88.75%, a specificity of 95.63%, an F1-score of 91.91%, and an AUC of 89.80%, demonstrating effective discriminative capability for early ischemia screening. Owing to its computational simplicity and noninvasive nature, the proposed MCDM framework represents a promising tool for scalable screening of ischemic heart disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.